Skip to main content

Negative Gearing (Insurance)

Using income protection insurance tax deductions to reduce taxable income from other sources, effectively subsidizing insurance costs through tax savings. Common for high-income earners and investors.

Detailed Explanation

Negative gearing in the insurance context refers to claiming income protection insurance premium tax deductions to offset against your overall taxable income, reducing your tax liability. While not 'negative gearing' in the traditional property investment sense, it achieves a similar tax outcome by creating deductible expenses that reduce your tax bill. For high-income earners, the tax deduction value can be substantial. Someone on the top marginal tax rate (47% including Medicare levy) paying $4,000 in income protection premiums can claim a $1,880 tax deduction, making the effective cost $2,120. The higher your marginal rate, the greater the tax benefit. Investors and business owners particularly benefit from this strategy. If you have multiple income streams (salary, rental income, business income), the income protection premium deduction reduces your overall taxable income across all sources. This is especially valuable if the insurance protects your income-earning capacity from multiple sources. The strategy becomes more powerful when combined with other tax planning strategies. For example, timing premium payments to coincide with high-income years maximizes the deduction value. Pre-paying annual premiums in June can bring forward the deduction to the current financial year. However, ATO rules require the expense to be genuinely incurred for income-producing purposes - the insurance must genuinely protect your income-earning capacity.

Common Misconceptions

  • All insurance can be negatively geared - only income protection premiums are generally tax deductible
  • Negative gearing means you make money from insurance - it just reduces the net cost through tax savings
  • You can claim insurance for any purpose - it must genuinely protect your income-earning capacity

Real-World Examples

  • David, a surgeon earning $450,000, pays $6,500 annually for comprehensive income protection. At the 47% marginal rate, he claims a $3,055 tax deduction, reducing the effective premium cost to $3,445 - less than half the gross cost.

  • Emma has rental properties generating $65,000 income and salary of $95,000. Her $2,800 income protection premium is tax deductible against her total $160,000 income, saving $1,036 in tax (37% rate), making the effective cost $1,764.

  • Mark, a business owner with variable income, pays his $3,200 annual income protection premium in June when he has a high-income year, claiming it against $180,000 income. The deduction saves him $1,491 (47% rate) rather than waiting until the next year when his income might be lower.

Ready to protect your future?

Get a personalized insurance quote tailored to your needs.