Skip to main content

Duty to Take Reasonable Care

This duty, introduced in 2021, requires consumers to take reasonable care not to make misrepresentations to insurers when applying for insurance or making claims, replacing the previous duty of disclosure.

Detailed Explanation

The duty to take reasonable care not to make a misrepresentation, which took effect on 5 October 2021 under the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 reforms, fundamentally changed consumer obligations when obtaining insurance. Previously, consumers had a duty of disclosure requiring them to tell insurers about every matter they knew was relevant. Now, consumers must take reasonable care to answer the insurer's questions truthfully and accurately. This shift makes the insurer responsible for asking the right questions rather than expecting consumers to know what might be relevant. What constitutes 'reasonable care' depends on individual circumstances including the type of insurance, the consumer's knowledge, and any assistance provided during the application process. If a consumer doesn't take reasonable care and makes a misrepresentation, the insurer's remedies depend on whether the misrepresentation was fraudulent, reckless, or neither. Non-fraudulent misrepresentations may result in proportionate reductions in claims payments rather than complete denial. This consumer-friendly reform reduces claim disputes arising from inadvertent non-disclosure.

Common Misconceptions

  • You don't need to volunteer information the insurer doesn't specifically ask about - the insurer must ask clear and relevant questions
  • Forgetting to mention something is not automatically fraud - the test is whether you took reasonable care based on your circumstances
  • The duty to take reasonable care doesn't end when you buy the policy - it also applies when varying coverage or making claims

Real-World Examples

  • A consumer forgot to mention a previous minor car accident when asked about their driving history; the insurer found this was not taking reasonable care and reduced the claim payment proportionately

  • An insurer asked 'Do you have any medical conditions?' without specifying what they considered relevant; when a claim was denied for non-disclosure, AFCA found the question was too broad and the consumer had taken reasonable care

  • A policyholder intentionally omitted information about pre-existing heart disease when asked directly; this fraudulent misrepresentation allowed the insurer to void the life insurance policy entirely

Ready to protect your future?

Get a personalized insurance quote tailored to your needs.